Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1984No. 14295PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

A jury found Ronnie Pierce guilty of robbery for his role in the holdup of a Twin Falls convenience store. After trial, Pierce admitted to his status as a persistent violat- or. The district judge sentenced Pierce to two concurrent, indeterminate terms not exceeding thirty years. On appeal, Pierce *99raises numerous issues which we have consolidated into three groups. Part I of our opinion discusses the requirement that testimony given by an accomplice be corroborated, and we consider whether lack of such corroboration at a preliminary hearing may be raised as an issue on appeal…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. PecorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. GibsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API