Legal Opinion

State v. Gibson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2005No. 30255PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Judge Pro Tem.

Erie K. Gibson appeals from his judgment of conviction following a conditional guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the order denying Gibson’s motion to suppress and vacate Gibson’s judgment of conviction.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In February 2003, at 2:49 in the morning, an officer with the Twin Falls Sheriffs Office observed a vehicle traveling approximately 33 mph on the right shoulder of the road. The officer watched…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Whitehead v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. BuntingIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API