Legal Opinion
State v. Pecor
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1998No. 22800PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLansing, Chief Judge
Charles Alan Pecor appeals from a judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. He makes several challenges to the admission of evidence at trial, the conduct of the prosecutor, and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
According to the State’s evidence at trial, Pecor’s conviction arose from the following events. On July 11, 1995, Pecor and Linda Singlestar told Rebecca Wilson that they were planning to drive to Coeur d’Alene to buy some methamphetamine. Wilson responded that some of her friends, including Georgia…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. PhillipsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. PurdumIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GerardoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. AverettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. GrossIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.