Legal Opinion

West v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1973No. Civ. 31342PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOOD, J. *

On November 8, 1969, appellants were injured when their car was rear-ended. Appellants were insured by respondent under a policy containing a provision for medical payments up to $1,000 per person, per occurrence. Appellants received and paid for medical treatment sums approximating $900. On November 9, appellants notified respondent’s local agent of the accident. There was no contact between the insured and insurer until after appellants had settled their claim against the driver of the other vehicle for $2,700. On June 26, 1970, they then made demand on respondent for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Peller v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Block v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. West End Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Trinity Tractor Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. CALIF. ST. AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS. v. AntonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Nager v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. GropmanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
  5. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API