Cid v. South Dakota Department of Social Services
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we affirm the decision of the Department of Social Services (DSS), which terminated certain welfare benefits to a legal resident alien, and hold that the denial of such benefits does not violate a provision of the South Dakota Constitution, which prevents a distinction between resident aliens and citizens in reference to property.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Carlos Cid, who is of Chilean ancestry, has worked in the United States since 1979 and is a naturalized United States citizen. In 1994, he married Me-darda Lagang, a Filipino, who at the time of the marriage…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. Commissioner of Transitional AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. v. HazeltineDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002
- Kurti v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Avila v. BiedessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.