Legal Opinion

Cid v. South Dakota Department of Social Services

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we affirm the decision of the Department of Social Services (DSS), which terminated certain welfare benefits to a legal resident alien, and hold that the denial of such benefits does not violate a provision of the South Dakota Constitution, which prevents a distinction between resident aliens and citizens in reference to property.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Carlos Cid, who is of Chilean ancestry, has worked in the United States since 1979 and is a naturalized United States citizen. In 1994, he married Me-darda Lagang, a Filipino, who at the time of the marriage…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. Commissioner of Transitional AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. v. HazeltineDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002
  4. Kurti v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Avila v. BiedessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API