Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kurti v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 20, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 01-0055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Judge.

¶ 1 Faik and Sequine Kurti are qualified aliens 1 who entered the United States on September 24, 1998. Both need non-emergency medical care for serious illnesses, but were denied non-emergency indigent health care from state and county programs because they failed to meet the eligibility requirements for qualified aliens under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 36-2903.03, 11-297(B), and 11-291(A) (Supp. 2000). These statutes limit indigent health care for qualified aliens who entered the United States after August 22,1996, to emergency care. The Kurtis challenge…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Soskin v. ReinertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Ehrlich v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Doe v. Commissioner of Transitional AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Avila v. BiedessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API