Legal Opinion
Remington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 8, 1997No. 15477PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The dispositive issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding the factors to be considered in determining whether an individual was a resident of an insured’s household and, therefore, covered by an underinsured motorist automobile policy. The plaintiff, the administratrix of the estate of William K. Remington (William), brought an action to recover underinsured motorist benefits under an automobile liability policy (policy) issued to Virginia Remington1 by the defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.
After a trial to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Anonymous v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Rathbun v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Griffith v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Ellice v. INA Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Scanlon v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- David Israel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.