Legal Opinion
Vazzano v. Slater
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 7, 1986No. 3166PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiffs1 are appealing from a judgment rendered following a jury verdict for the defendants2 in this action for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial.
The plaintiffs claim that the court erred (1) in failing to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the defendant because the evidence did not support the verdict, (2) in limiting the testimony of the plaintiffs’ rebuttal witness, and (3) in admitting page one of the two page police report as the defendants’ exhibit.
The jury could…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Tetro v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sanderson v. Steve Snyder Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SummervilleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. ChiarizioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Schwarz v. Waterbury Public Market, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. RochetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.