Legal Opinion
State v. Rochette
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 23, 1991No. 9106PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant appeals from her conviction, after a jury trial, of larceny in the fifth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-125a, and attempted larceny in the third degree in violation of *300General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-124 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims (1) that the trial court improperly admitted a written telephone message under the business record exception to the hearsay rule, (2) that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction of larceny in the fifth degree, and (3) that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction of attempted larceny…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. PlourdeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CepedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. NosikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Baughman v. CollinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.