Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 28, 1989No. 7111PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred (1) in refusing to suppress the out-of-court identification of the defendant, (2) in allowing a police officer to give opinion testimony concerning her experience with crime victims, and (3) in refusing to comply with the defendant’s requested jury instruction concerning eyewitness identifications.
The following facts are not in dispute. At approximately 6:15 p.m. on November 23,1986, Josephine Dod was returning to her house…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CerilliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Zummo v. ZummoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- State v. AleksiewiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. PolancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.