Legal Opinion

Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the March 12, 2008 Order granting summary judgment and/or judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant/appellee, Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund (PEBTF), dismissing plaintiff/appellant Robert John Scalice’s complaint for declaratory judgment, and awarding PEBTF $43,795.94, plus costs and interest, relative to its sub-rogation suit.

¶ 2 Appellant argues summary judgment was inappropriate because there existed questions of material fact with regard to (1) whether PEBTF was an Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan (ERISA);…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Kaiser v. Old Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Curry v. Huron InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wimer v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Braddock v. OhnmeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API