Legal Opinion

Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2005No. 38 WAP 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

883 A.2d 429 (2005)

Robert John SCALICE, Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 7, 2005.

Decided September 28, 2005.

James D. Belliveau, Pittsburgh, for Robert John Scalice, appellant.

Richard Kirschner, for Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund (PEBTF), appellee.

Before: CAPPY, C.J., NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

This appeal raises a question under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA" or "Act"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Specifically, we consider whether the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API