Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Old Republic Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Old Republic Insurance Company, appeals from the order which denied its post-trial motion to set aside the court’s non-jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs/appellees. 1 We affirm.

¶ 2 The underlying facts in this matter are not in dispute and were ably set forth by the trial court as follows:

The Plaintiffs [appellees] are the administrators of the Catastrophic Loss Benefits Continuation Fund, which is the successor to the Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund (hereinafter “the CAT Fund”) [2] . The Defendant [appellant], Old Republic Insurance Company (“Old Republic”) is an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Slaseman v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Anderson v. Greenville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Cresci Construction Services, Inc. v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Allegheny Energy Supply Co. v. Wolf Run Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Sabella, D. v. Appalachian Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Century Indemnity Co. v. OneBeacon Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. National Union InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API