Legal Opinion
401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Group
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.
¶ 1 401 Fourth Street, Inc. appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Investors Insurance Group. We reverse.
¶2 The facts of this case are not in dispute. Appellant is the owner of a building in Montgomery County which is insured by means of a policy issued by Ap-pellee. Appellant paid an additional premium to include an endorsement providing coverage for collapse. Specifically, the policy provided:
D. ADDITIONAL COVERAGE-COLLAPSE
We will pay for loss or damage caused by or resulting from risks of direct physical loss involving collapse of a building or any part of a building caused…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Skelly v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Peffer v. Penn 21 AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Kattelman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Dominick v. Statesman InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Roberts v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Liston-Smith v. Csaa Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.