Legal Opinion

Braddock v. Ohnmeiss

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion By Klein, J.

¶ 1 Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund (PEBTF) 1 appeals from the trial court’s order denying post-trial motions and making final its order denying PEBTF’s request to intervene to enforce subrogation rights to proceeds from the settlement of an automobile accident claim. 2 Although our decision is based on different grounds, we affirm the trial court’s order denying relief. 3

¶ 2 Glenna Braddock, a participant in a health care plan provided by the PEBTF, was involved in a motor vehicle accident on October 25, 1996. After exhausting benefits from Erie Insurance, Braddock re ceived first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shearer v. NaftzingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Allegheny Anesthesiology Associates, Inc. v. Allegheny General HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Independence Blue Cross v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Scalice v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erdely v. Hinchcliffe and Keener, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API