Legal Opinion

Ernst v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2004No. 20030330PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald R. Ernst appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Ernst argues the trial court erred in finding he failed to prove his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On October 28, 2002, Ernst pled guilty to burglary, stalking, two counts of theft of property, disorderly conduct, criminal mischief, and indecent exposure. The charges resulted, in part, from a search of Ernst’s home in Richfield, Minnesota, conducted by Minnesota police officers executing a Minnesota search warrant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API