Legal Opinion
State v. Moos
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2008No. 20080047, 20080048PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Douglas Moos appealed from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of forgery or counterfeiting, deceptive writings, and theft by deception, and from an order dismissing his motion for a new trial. We conclude Moos was improperly convicted and sentenced upon multiplicious counts, and we therefore reverse the judgment and remand with directions that the district court vacate some of the convictions. In all other respects, the judgment and the order dismissing the motion for a new trial are affirmed.
I
[¶ 2] The charges in these cases stem from lease…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. StudhorseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BearrunnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.