Legal Opinion
Asleson v. Allison
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 31, 1933No. 28,975PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Chief Justice.
Defendant Allison appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Charles Rank and Harry O. Dahl were partners for the development and operation of a fur farm. Each of the plaintiffs held a separate contract, all of the same substance, one of which is as follows:
“Agreement
“This agreement entered into by and between O. A. Roedell, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Minnesota Northern Fur Farms Company of Minneapolis, Minnesota, do hereby agree that in consideration of the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), receipt of. which is hereby acknowledged, O. A. Roedell is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Northwestern National Bank v. Mickelson-Shapiro Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Red River Potato Growers Ass'n v. BernardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- O'Brien Mercantile Co. v. Bay Lake Fruit Growers Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Snyder Electric Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Minnesota Hotel Co. v. Rosa Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Seward v. SchrieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Aaron Carlson Corp. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, LLC, Glen Haven Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017