Legal Opinion

O'Brien Mercantile Co. v. Bay Lake Fruit Growers Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1928No. Nos. 26,464, 26,468PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

There are two actions. Each sought the appointment of a receiver of the Bay Lake Fruit Growers Association. The action first commenced was prosecuted' by the O’Brien Mercantile Company, a general creditor, whose claim had not been reduced to judgment. The other was prosecuted by Gowan-Lenning-Brown Company, which having acquired an assignment of a small judgment pressed its suit as a judgment creditor.

The ultimate purpose in both actions was to enforce the stockholders’ double liability. The corporation had been adjudged a bankrupt. The first action sought the appointment of Donald I. Ryan as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Way v. BarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Northwestern National Bank v. Mickelson-Shapiro Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minnesota Hotel Co. v. Rosa Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Asleson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. In Re Schwartz Bros.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
  4. Chandler v. HumphreyWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API