Legal Opinion

Foster v. Ford Motor Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1926No. 19550. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Appellant, Ford Motor Company, is engaged in the business of .manufacturing Fordson tractors, which are held out to the public as being suit able for performing ordinary farm work. Defendants, Irwin and wife, are the owners of one of these tractors, purchased from a dealer in Yakima, for use on their ranch near that city. Respondent, Foster, was employed by the Irwins to work upon their ranch. His work required the use of the tractor in question, and upon the third day of his employment, the tractor became deeply mired in the mud. Being unable to pull the tractor out by its own power on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Olds Motor Works v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Hasbrouck v. Armour & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Lewis v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. EI DuPONT DE NEM. & CO. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API