Legal Opinion
Keeney v. Mystic Valley Hunt Club, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 31, 2006No. 25538, 25716PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiffs, Heather Keeney, a minor, 1 and her mother, Teresa Keeney, appeal from the judg ment of the trial court rendered on a jury verdict that the court directed in favor of the defendant, Mystic Valley Hunt Club, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) precluded their expert from testifying and (2) directed a verdict in favor of the defendant and denied their motion to set aside the verdict. We affirm the judgment. 2
Heather Keeney was a student receiving horseback riding lessons at a riding academy owned by the defendant, when, during a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bader v. United Orthodox SynagogueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Kolich v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Vanliner Insurance v. FayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Precision Mechanical Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- White v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.