Legal Opinion
Davis v. Margolis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 19, 1990No. 13695PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is what qualifications are necessary for an expert witness to testify in a legal malpractice case. The plaintiff, Craig M. Davis, brought a legal malpractice action against *409the defendant, attorney Emanuel Margolis, alleging, inter alia, that the defendant violated professional duties owed to him as a result of his consultation with the defendant. The trial began on October 18,1988, in the Superior Court in Hartford, and ended on October 27, 1988, when the court granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The trial court based its decision on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Barnes v. SchleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. BriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Martinez v. BadisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.