Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 1, 2006No. AC 24895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The plaintiff, James E. Sullivan, administrator of the estate of James P. Sullivan, the plaintiffs decedent (decedent), brought this wrongful death action against the defendant Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company,1 alleging that the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain and to provide adequate security at one of its train stations. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment, claiming that the court improperly (1) precluded expert testimony, (2)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Cox v. BurdickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Durante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API