Legal Opinion
Boyajian v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 24, 2008No. 07-CV-214-P-SPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 44) and Defendant’s Motion to Preclude Testimony and Reports of Plaintiffs Expert Witness (Docket # 45). As explained herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 44). The Court RESERVES RULING on Defendant’s Motion to Preclude Testimony and Reports of Plaintiffs Expert Witness (Docket # 45).
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Summary judgment is appropriate only if the record shows “that there is no genuine…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Venable v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Joyce v. Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Deslauriers v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- CORSON v. MODULA INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Gonzalez-Tomasini v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.