Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
To address the issues on this appeal, we must examine the closely competing interests of a eontract-for-deed vendor and the mechanic’s lien claimant with whom the vendor has had only slight contact. In this case, we reverse the trial court judgment that the contractor is entitled to a lien, correcting the court’s conclusion that the claimant had too little knowledge about the vendor’s interest in the property to trigger the statutory requirement for prelien notice. We also reverse the trial court’s conclusion that the facts of the case show unjust enrichment of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Anderson v. DeLisleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Reserve Mining Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rainbow Play Systems, Inc. v. Groundscape Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Heimbach v. Riedman Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- O'Brien & Wolf, LLP v. S. Cent. Minn. Elec. Workers' Family Health PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Michael S. Dietz v. Ronald LanglieUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.