Legal Opinion

Rainbow Play Systems, Inc. v. Groundscape Technologies, LLC

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 12, 2005No. CIV. 03-3411MJDJGLPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER

DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before this Court is the motion of Defendant GroundScape Technologies, LLC (“GroundScape”) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff Rainbow Play Systems, Inc. (“Rainbow”) manufactures wooden play systems, and Defendant GroundScape manufactures “rubber ground surfacing,” a rubber mulch-like material used under play systems for safety. The Complaint alleges trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, and unfair business practices. GroundScape now moves for summary judgment on all of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  2. Coyne's & Co., Inc. v. ENESCO, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  3. Soilworks, LLC v. Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Intertape Polymer Corp. v. Inspired Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
  5. Healthmate International, LLC v. FrenchDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API