Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAUBER, Judge.
In this mechanic’s lien dispute, appellant-bank argues that the district court erred by concluding that a lienor’s delivery of a mechanic’s lien statement constituted service of that statement for purposes of Minn.Stat. § 514.08, subd. 1(2), when such delivery did not satisfy Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.02. Because Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.02 does not apply to service of a mechanic’s lien statement, we affirm.
FACTS
Defendant Kevin Lam is the owner of Wing-Heng, Inc., which in turn owns and *634operates a La Quinta Inns & Suites Hotel (the hotel). The hotel is situated on real property…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012