MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. Berg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
We reverse and remand for further proceedings to determine if the plaintiff contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien.
Defendant-respondent James I. Berg hired plaintiff-appellant Merle’s Construction Company, Inc., under a written contract to perform extensive restoration of Berg’s home. A dispute arose and the Construction Company, claiming it was owed a balance of $28,678.03, commenced an action to foreclose its mechanic’s lien. Defendant Berg filed an answer denying the amount owed, denying he had ever been served with a prelien notice, and counterclaiming for damages.
Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nasseff v. SchoeneckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Pelletier Corp. v. Chas. M. Freidheim Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Berg v. Merle's Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Twin City Pipe Trades Service Ass'n v. Peak Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.