Legal Opinion

MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. Berg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1989No. C5-88-1145PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings to determine if the plaintiff contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien.

Defendant-respondent James I. Berg hired plaintiff-appellant Merle’s Construction Company, Inc., under a written contract to perform extensive restoration of Berg’s home. A dispute arose and the Construction Company, claiming it was owed a balance of $28,678.03, commenced an action to foreclose its mechanic’s lien. Defendant Berg filed an answer denying the amount owed, denying he had ever been served with a prelien notice, and counterclaiming for damages.

Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Nasseff v. SchoeneckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Pelletier Corp. v. Chas. M. Freidheim Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Berg v. Merle's Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Twin City Pipe Trades Service Ass'n v. Peak Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API