Steiner v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Judge:
This military pay controversy comes before the court on lengthy, but well briefed, dispositive motions filed by the parties and oral argument. At issue is whether plaintiff has established a claim(s) within the court’s jurisdiction for active duty status and pay for the period from June 1974 until March 1976, and for increased disability retirement compensation thereafter.
Facts
From the extensive record filed in this matter, certain undisputed facts emerge.
Plaintiff entered the United States Army in October 1969 and trained as a light infantryman. In July 1970, while…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Bruno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Goeppner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Coon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Colon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.