Legal Opinion
Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 13, 1964No. 333-62PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam: In this suit for unpaid portions of operating-differential subsidy allegedly due the plaintiff company, there is no material dispute as to the facts and both parties have moved for summary judgment. The case was referred to Trial Commissioner Mastín G. White, pursuant to Rule 37(e), for his recommendation for a conclusion of law. The Commissioner has submitted an opinion and a recommended conclusion. Defendant has sought review of that opinion and recommendation. Oral argument has been had and the briefs have been considered. The court agrees with the Commissioner’s recommendation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Empire Institute of Tailoring, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Cannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Manufacturers Aircraft Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Austin Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- American-Foreign Steamship Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Morris Kinsey D/B/A Kinsey Farms, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.