Berry v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This matter is before the Court-on both Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss, the basis for each being that the Complaint should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1).1 Plaintiff, Sylvester Berry, seeks damages, including back pay, benefits, and reinstatement to the United States Marshals Service (USMS or Service). Plaintiff alleges four claims arising out of the USMS’s removal of him from the Service. This Court finds that it lacks jurisdiction over this matter.
Factual Background
Plaintiff, a black…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Kiewit Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Troutman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.