Legal Opinion

Bath Iron Works Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 28, 1995No. Nos. 90-897C, 90-898CPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Bath Iron Works Corporation, following an adverse final decision of the contracting officer, filed these actions in this Court on September 7, 1990, seeking equitable adjustments on two shipbuilding con*222tracts with the United States. These matters are presently before the court for decision on the merits following a trial held on March 20-29, 1995, in Washington, D.C.

At trial, the primary issue for decision was — whether, and to what extent, plaintiff had in fact incurred compensable increased costs of performance on the contracts…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Neal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. White Buffalo Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Cray Research, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API