Legal Opinion
Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 15, 2005No. 92-517-CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Both liability and damages remain unresolved in this Wwsiar-related case.1 Plaintiffs are federal savings banks or “thrifts” which allege that the government breached a contract entered in 1983 involving the treatment of goodwill as regulatory capital and that plaintiffs suffered expectancy and reliance damages as a result of the breach. To adjudicate the disputed issues of fact, the court conducted a 24-day trial commencing on January 18, 2005 and ending on March 23, 2005. Post-trial briefs were filed thereafter, and a closing argument was held on…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bank of America, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.