Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 8, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 9207PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Donald E. Marshall (Marshall or plaintiff) filed a three count complaint against The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company and The Procter & Gamble Distributing Company (Procter & Gamble or defendants). Defendants answered and counterclaimed for declarations the converse of plaintiff’s claims. During the course of the trial, the counterclaims were abandoned.
The third cause of action was for alleged “False Marking and Misrepresentation in violation of Title 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (Lanham Act). Defendants moved that the third cause of action be dismissed for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- GAF Corp. v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Wayne Knitting Mills v. Russell Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1967
- National Machinery Co. v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
- McCulloch Motors Corp. v. Oregon Saw Chain Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1964