Legal Opinion
Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 19, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 10181PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a petition to have defendant Ionic Electrostatic Corporation (hereinafter “defendant”; Proctor is not herein involved) adjudicated to be in contempt of an order passed by this court on May 7, 1962, and for an awarding of damages, including actual damages, expenses and attorney’s fees, for such alleged contempt. Subsequently the petition was amended to request trebling of actual damages for alleged willful and wanton violation of the injunction. Defendant has responded, denying any violation of the injunction and claiming that all its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peters v. Active Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Company, Inc., and Ionic Electrostatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Marshall v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Spiller & Spiller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Spiller & Spiller, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.