Legal Opinion

Harrington v. . Lowrie

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

This ease comes to us upon appeal from a judgment overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. It is contended that facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action are not therein stated.

An examination of the complaint shows that the following material facts were alleged, upon which recovery from the defendant is sought. Plaintiffs are cotton buyers on the market in Ansonville. Their method of doing business was to give the seller of the cotton purchased a cotton ticket showing bale number, weight, price and total amount due, and by arrangement with the Bank of Anson this amount was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simms v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Bahnsen v. . ClemmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Morgan v. . SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Wilson v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Pool v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Wells v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. First National City Bank v. McManusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Alamance Lumber Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API