Legal Opinion

Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 26, 1955No. 595PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The first question posed by this appeal is whether the plaintiff made out a prima facie case of money had and received.

An action for money had and received may be maintained as a general rule “whenever the defendant has money in his hands which belongs to the plaintiff, and which in equity and good conscience he ought to pay to the plaintiff. . . . The plaintiff is entitled to recover when it appears that the money in question belonged to the plaintiff and was secured by the defendant without the consent of the plaintiff, or if with his consent, without consideration.” Wilson v. Lee, 211 N.C.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Smith Chapel Baptist Church v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Canady v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Primerica Life Insurance v. James Massengill & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API