First National City Bank v. McManus
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOREIS, Judge.
Plaintiff appellant, contending that the money was paid out to the defendant payee under a mistake of fact, maintains that defendant, unjustly enriched and unable to construct an adequate defense in law or equity, must accede to plaintiff’s demand for repayment. We agree.
The issue of who stands for the loss and disappointment when money has been disbursed under some mistaken belief of entitlement is always problematic. Our Supreme Court, structuring the problem along lines of equity, justice and transactional security, broadly holds that “ . . . money paid to another under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Westamerica Securities, Inc. v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Dean v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Ohio Co. v. RosemeierOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Simms v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Primerica Life Insurance v. James Massengill & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Bank Saderat Iran v. Amin Beydoun, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Lee v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HastingsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990
- Amsouth Investment Services, Incorporated v. Ronald E. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.