Morgan v. . Spruill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, J.
There is evidence in tbe record tending to show that tbe facts are not so favorable to tbe plaintiff as here stated. However, there was a judgment of nonsuit and we consider tbe evidence in tbe light most favorable to tbe plaintiff.
An action to recover money paid under a mistake of fact is an action in assumpsit and is permitted on tbe theory that by such payment tbe recipient has been unjustly enriched at tbe expense of tbe party making tbe payment and is liable for money bad and received. It is well settled that money paid voluntarily with knowledge of tbe facts cannot be recovered back. If…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Sparrow v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. ReaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Harrington v. . LowrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Queen v. SiskSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.