Legal Opinion
State v. Weidenhof
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 17, 1987No. 13021PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the incriminatory statements that the defendant made during a custodial interrogation. The defendant, Daniel Weidenhof II, was charged in a three count informa*264tion with the crimes of kidnapping in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes .§ 53a-92a,1 threatening in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62,2 and having a weapon in a motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 29-38.3 After a jury verdict finding him guilty on all counts, the defendant was sentenced to a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.