Pickel v. Automated Waste Disposal, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Clara Pickel,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, Automated Waste Disposal, Inc. (Automated Waste), and DeVivo Industries, Inc. (DeVivo). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) deprived her of a fair trial because of its abusive conduct, (2) ruled on certain evidence and (3) refused to allow her to make an offer of proof. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On April 15, 1994, Automated Waste delivered a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Boretti v. Panacea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.