Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Feneque

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 30, 2010No. AC 29718PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 1 the plaintiffs insurance carrier, appeals from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Marilyn O’Donnell. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) abused its discretion in denying its motion to set aside the verdict based on insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and (2) improperly instructed the jury. 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are not in dispute. On January 3, 2003, the plaintiff left her workplace in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Terminal Taxi Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smart v. CorbittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Dongguk University v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  3. Twin Oaks Condominium Ass'n v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Gregory v. GreggConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Clark v. Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API