Legal Opinion
Putz v. Putz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 2002No. C7-01-527Published
1Opinion of the Court
645 N.W.2d 343 (2002)
In re Paul Daniel PUTZ, n/k/a Paul Ben-Yehuda, Respondent,
v.
Jamile Therese PUTZ, Respondent Below,
COUNTY OF BENTON, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C7-01-527.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 13, 2002.
Robert J. Raupp, Benton County Attorney, Robert B. Anderson, Asst. Benton County Attorney, Foley, MN, for Appellant.
Lynne M. Ridgway, Hall & Byers, P.A., St. Cloud, MN, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
This is an appeal by Benton County from a court of appeals' decision affirming a child support magistrate's order that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.