Legal Opinion

Thornley v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 29, 1962No. C.D. 2325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

The issue in these cases is whether inflatable liferafts, composed in chief value of india rubber, which were imported as cargo and not as part of the appurtenances of the importing vessels, should be considered, for tar ill purposes, “vessels” or as imported articles subject to duty. There is no provision of the tariff act which specifically exempts vessels generally from the payment of customs duties. In the case of The Conqueror, 166 U.S. 110, 41 L. ed. 937, in passing upon the tariff status as dutiable or nondutiable status of a foreign-built, American-owned steam yacht,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hitner Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Thayer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Tregoning Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Marine v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. United States v. Seagull MarineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API