Legal Opinion

United States v. Seagull Marine

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 31, 1980No. C.A.D. 1251; No. 79-40PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 83 Cust. Ct. 10, C.D. 4814, 475 F. Supp. 158 (1979), sustaining appellee’s claim that the goods in issue, inflatable rubber liferafts, are vessels and as such are intangibles and not dutiable under the Tariff Act of 1930. We reverse.

The Imported Merchandise

The merchandise in this action consists of inflatable rubber liferafts exported from Wales and entered in California in early 1977. These liferafts have a carrying capacity of from 4 to 16 persons, are made of rubber covered fabric with sides consisting of two…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Marine v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. Thornley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elizabeth River Terminals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  2. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Wael Salim Elhalwani v. Ziad BourjiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API