Tregoning Boat Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Presiding Judge:
This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the duties paid in connection *197witb tbe entry of wbat is described on tíre pro jorma invoice as “1 unfinished 17 foot wood boat bull” which arrived at the port of Seattle on board a steamer as cargo.
Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 33){per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “manufactures of wood * * * or of which wood * * * is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for.”
Plaintiff claims that the so-called “boat…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Hitner Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Thayer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Lawson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Thornley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Protest 73445-K of Furness Pacific, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1947
- Protests 87683-K of LandweerUnited States Customs Court · 1946