Legal Opinion

Tregoning Boat Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 14, 1945No. C. D. 971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the duties paid in connection *197witb tbe entry of wbat is described on tíre pro jorma invoice as “1 unfinished 17 foot wood boat bull” which arrived at the port of Seattle on board a steamer as cargo.

Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 33){per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “manufactures of wood * * * or of which wood * * * is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for.”

Plaintiff claims that the so-called “boat…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  3. Hitner Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  4. Thayer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Lawson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Thornley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Protest 73445-K of Furness Pacific, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Protests 87683-K of LandweerUnited States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API