Legal Opinion

Hitner Sons Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1922No. 2518PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

This case involves the dutiable status of the former Canadian cruiser Niohe, brought within the customs jurisdiction of the United States at the port of Philadelphia by appellant August 16, 1922. On September 15, 1922, it was entered by the appellant as scrap metals fit only to be remanufactured, and as such, free of duty. It was classified for duty by the collector at 20 per centum as manufactures of metal not specially provided for, under paragraph 167, tariff act of October 3, 1913. The appellant protested, claiming his importation to be entitled to free entry either as old junk, under…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Ex Parte EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Saylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Tregoning Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Thornley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. United States v. Porto Rico Coal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. Protest 88698-K of Whitney Bros.United States Customs Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API