Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Roth
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal we consider the validity of a household exclusion clause in an automobile insurance policy issued by Appellee Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide). If the clause is valid, then Appellant Kenneth L. Roth cannot recover the stacked limits of the underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits allowed by the policy.
I
Roth was severely injured in an accident on June 22, 2002 while operating his motorcycle, which was insured under Nationwide Policy No. 58 37 C 853255 (motorcycle policy). After Nationwide paid Roth $50,000 in UIM benefits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gabe Keri v. Board of Trustees of Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. AyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Mosley v. City of Pittsburgh Public School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Tung Nguyen v. AK Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Geisinger Community Medical Center v. BurwellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Krash v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.