Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hollingsworth

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 10962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Plaintiffs, as receivers of the Julian Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation, on August 8, 1927, instituted this action at law in four counts against the defendant, W. I. Hollingsworth, to collect treble damages for usurious interest paid to him as follows: $19,000 on December 11, 1926; $19,000 on January 11, 1927; $19,000 on February 19, 1927, and $19,000 on April 5, 1927. The total amount so paid was $76,000, which, when trebled, aggregates the sum of $228,000. Said sums were paid on an existing promissory note, having a principal sum of $100,000 then due and payable, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  2. North v. Cecil B. DeMille Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Fenton v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Barnes v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Morand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API