Fenton v. Markwell & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
11 Cal.App.2d Supp. 755 (1935)
D. FENTON, Appellant,
v.
MARKWELL & Co., Respondent.
California Court of Appeals.
November 29, 1935.
Sig E. Murphy, William H. Brawner and Harry K. Sargent for Appellant.
Vernon S. Gray for Respondent.
Mathes & Sheppard, Robert C. Ford, L. J. Styskal, O'Melveny, Tuller & Myers, Williamson, Ramsay & Hoge and Lloyd A. Free, as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Respondent.
Shaw, P. J.
By counts 1 and 3 of his complaint herein plaintiff seeks to recover, under the usury law, treble the sums paid by him for interest on certain loans alleged to have been usurious. Some of this interest…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Los Angeles City School District v. Landier Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Orden v. Crawshaw Mortgage & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- United Realty Trust v. Property Development & Research Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.